“Birds of a feather flock together” or “Opposites attract”? FRANĂAIS We have all seen those relationships where the partners are the complete opposite of each other. Perhaps one partner is organized and needs a logical explanation for everything, while the other is spontaneous and focused on how others feel. Instead of these two approaches creating conflict, the couple provides balance to each other and operates in harmony. The organized partner provides some structure and focus to the otherâs life, while the spontaneous one brings unexpected surprises and spur of the moment ideas to keep their lives interesting and the relationship fresh. And then there are the relationships where the two are exactly like each other. Some research has suggested that people with similar personalities are more likely to be happy in their marriage.[1] Human-computer interaction experiments have revealed that people prefer artificial voices that carry traits similar to their own extraversion/introversion preferences.[2] Research has even found similar results when comparing dogs and their owners![3] Why do these relationships work so well? Trust plays a role: Those who are similar to us are deemed more trustworthy, and are perceived as more attractive.[4] However, these contradicting (yet successful) approaches to relationships begs the question: Are we attracted to people who are different or similar to us?  Or is moderation the key? With these questions in mind, we would like to explore the connections between personality type preferences between couples. You can help us out by sharing your type preferences and those of your partner in the short survey below. Type and Attraction Survey Thank you for participating! View the results here. « Qui se ressemble, sâassemble » ou « Les opposĂ©s sâattirent » Nous avons tous vu ces relations oĂč les partenaires sont complĂštement opposĂ©s. Peut-ĂȘtre qu’un partenaire est bien organisĂ© et a besoin d’une explication logique pour tout, tandis que l’autre est spontanĂ© et centrĂ© sur ce que ressentent les autres. Au lieu que ces deux approches crĂ©ent des conflits, le couple s’Ă©quilibre et fonctionne en harmonie. Le partenaire bien organisĂ© fournit une structure et une orientation Ă la vie de lâautre, tandis que le partenaire spontanĂ© leur rĂ©serve des surprises inattendues et leur donne des idĂ©es de derniĂšre minute pour garder leur vie intĂ©ressante et leur passion en vie. Et puis il y a les relations oĂč les deux sont exactement pareils. Certaines recherches ont suggĂ©rĂ© que les personnes ayant des personnalitĂ©s similaires sont plus susceptibles d’ĂȘtre heureuses dans leur mariage. Des expĂ©riences dâinteraction entre « homme-machine » ont rĂ©vĂ©lĂ© que les gens prĂ©fĂ©raient les voix artificielles prĂ©sentant des traits similaires Ă leurs prĂ©fĂ©rences en fonction de leurs types de personnalitĂ© « extraversion / introversion ». La recherche a mĂȘme trouvĂ© des rĂ©sultats similaires en comparant les chiens et leurs propriĂ©taires! Pourquoi ces relations fonctionnent-elles si bien ? La confiance joue un rĂŽle: ceux qui nous ressemblent sont considĂ©rĂ©s comme plus dignes de confiance et perçus comme plus attrayants. Cependant, ces approches contradictoires « malgrĂ© leurs succĂšs » soulĂšvent la question suivante: Sommes-nous attirĂ©s par les gens qui sont diffĂ©rents ou similaires Ă nous ? Ou bien la modĂ©ration est-elle la clĂ©? Gardant ces questions Ă lâesprit, nous voudrions explorer les liens entre les prĂ©fĂ©rences de type de personnalitĂ© dâun couple Ă lâautre. Vous pouvez nous aider en partageant vos prĂ©fĂ©rences de type de personnalitĂ© et celles de votre partenaire dans le bref sondage ci-dessous. Sondage sur le type de personnalitĂ© et les attractions Voir les resultas! [1] Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. Academic Press, New York. [2] Nass, C & Lee, K. (2001). Does computer synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction and consistency attraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3), 171â181. [3] TurcsĂĄn, B., Range, F., VirĂĄnyi, Z., MiklĂłsi, Ă., & Kubinyi, E. (2012). Birds of a feather flock together? Perceived personality matching in ownerâdog dyads. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 140(3-4), 154-160 [4] Singh, R., Tay, Y & Sankaran, K. (2017). Causal role of trust in interpersonal attraction from attitude similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(5), 717â731.